📝QUESTÕES DE MÚLTIPLA ESCOLHA
🔹30 Multiple Choice Questions | FOUR-Option Question |
❑ For questions 21-24, consider the following text.
Two US banks collapse
"Dois bancos dos EUA falem"
Last week, Silicon Valley Bank failed, and it left
customers in a tough spot as the government took
___1___ .
The so-called bank run happened because there
___2___ news that the bank couldn’t meet its
deposit obligations.
It means that it had invested
the money in various things that weren’t making
the money back.
Typically, that’s the point where
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
___3___ insures deposits ___4___ 250,000 dollars,
comes in.
However, 98% of Silicon Valley Bank
customers didn’t have 250,000 dollars but billions
of dollars.
The government announced that it
would step in and secure the depositors, with US
president Joe Biden ___5___ that the US banking
system was safe.
Shortly after the fall of Silicon Valley Bank,
regulators closed New York-based Signature Bank,
too, citing systemic risk.
Experts said that these
stories would continue repeating themselves
because many corporations were overleveraged in
dollar debt.
After the collapse, European banks lost 100 billion
dollars in value in a week, and despite tough
regulations that should make a similar banking
failure in Europe unlikely, the contagion is
accelerating.
❑ Questão 21
– Now choose the CORRECT item.
a) In sentences I, II and III, the word “that” is
optional, but in sentences IV and V, it’s
mandatory.
b) In sentences I, II and V, the word “that” is optional,
but in sentences III and IV, it’s mandatory.
c) In sentences I, III and V, the word “that” is
optional, but in sentences II and IV, it’s
mandatory.
d) In all five sentences, the word “that” is mandatory.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão #21 com atenção ao uso do pronome relativo/conjunção “that”, que costuma ser uma pegadinha comum em provas de inglês.
📝 Contexto do texto
O texto contém cinco lacunas numeradas (1 a 5), todas envolvendo “that”:
“…as the government took 1.”
“because there 2 news that the bank couldn’t meet its deposit obligations.”
“the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 3 insures deposits 4 250,000 dollars, comes in.”
Dentro da frase acima, lacuna relacionada ao valor: 4 250,000 dollars
“with US president Joe Biden 5 that the US banking system was safe.”
🧠 Regras de uso de “that”
Conjunção subordinativa (“that”): liga uma oração subordinada objetiva a um verbo ou expressão, podendo ser opcional ou obrigatória dependendo do verbo e do estilo.
Ex.:
“He said (that) the bank was failing.” → “that” opcional
“It is important that he arrives on time.” → “that” obrigatório
🔍 Análise frase a frase
I – “…as the government took 1.”
O verbo “took” + substantivo (“action/measures”) → pode usar that opcionalmente.
II – “…because there 2 news that the bank couldn’t meet its deposit obligations.”
Estrutura: there was news that …
Aqui, “that” é obrigatório para introduzir a cláusula subordinada (“the bank couldn’t meet…”).
III – “…the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 3 insures deposits …”
Oração relativa explicativa: the FDIC, which/that insures deposits…
Aqui “that” é opcional se usar “which” ou pode ser usado para conectar a oração relativa restritiva.
IV – “…deposits 4 250,000 dollars…”
Estrutura: deposits that are up to 250,000 dollars
Aqui “that” é obrigatório para a cláusula restritiva.
V – “…with US president Joe Biden 5 that the US banking system was safe.”
Estrutura: Biden said (that) …
Aqui, “that” é opcional, estilo discursivo.
✅ Conclusão
Opcional: I, III e V
Obrigatório: II e IV
Portanto, a alternativa correta é:
🅑 In sentences I, II and V, the word “that” is optional, but in sentences III and IV, it’s mandatory.
Observação: atenção às diferenças entre oração relativa restritiva e oração subordinada objetiva — é onde o “that” muda de obrigatoriedade.
❑ Questão 22 – The blanks numbered as “3” and “4” could be
CORRECTLY filled with, RESPECTIVELY:
a) which – up to.
b) that – until.
c) what – within.
d) in which – until.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 22 com atenção às lacunas 3 e 4 👇
📝 Contexto das lacunas
“…Typically, that’s the point where the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 3 insures deposits 4 250,000 dollars, comes in.”
🧩 Análise da lacuna 3
Frase completa: “the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 3 insures deposits…”
Aqui precisamos de um pronome relativo que ligue a oração principal à oração relativa explicativa.
Opções: which / that / what / in which
Escolha correta: “which”
“which” introduz uma oração relativa explicativa: the FDIC, which insures deposits …, comes in
“that” poderia ser usado, mas em orações explicativas com vírgula, which é preferido.
“what” e “in which” são incorretos aqui.
🧩 Análise da lacuna 4
Frase: “…insures deposits 4 250,000 dollars…”
Queremos indicar o limite de valor assegurado pelo FDIC.
Opções: up to / until / within / until
Escolha correta: “up to”
Expressa o limite máximo: up to $250,000 → até 250 mil dólares.
“until” e “within” não são adequados para indicar limite de cobertura em dinheiro.
✅ Conclusão
Lacuna 3 → which
Lacuna 4 → up to
Portanto, a alternativa correta é:
🅐 which – up to
❑ Questão 23 – The blank numbered as “5” could be CORRECTLY
filled with:
a) say.
b) said.
c) says.
d) saying.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 23 detalhadamente, focando na lacuna 5:
📝 Contexto da lacuna 5
“…The government announced that it would step in and secure the depositors, with US president Joe Biden 5 that the US banking system was safe.”
🧩 Análise das opções
say → presente simples
“Joe Biden say that …” → gramaticalmente incorreto; o sujeito é singular e o tempo verbal não concorda com a estrutura da frase (já passada e reportada).
said → passado simples
“Joe Biden said that …” → correto em tempo passado, mas veja que a frase principal usa “would step in” (futuro no passado). A forma que se encaixa melhor na estrutura com “with” + sujeito + verbo é um gerúndio para expressar ação simultânea.
says → presente simples
Também não combina com o contexto de narração/reportagem em passado.
saying → gerúndio
“with US president Joe Biden saying that the US banking system was safe.”
Correto, porque “with” exige o gerúndio para indicar ação simultânea ou acompanhando a ação principal (“announced”)
Tradução: “…com o presidente Joe Biden afirmando que o sistema bancário dos EUA era seguro.” ✅
✅ Conclusão
Lacuna 5 → saying
Gabarito: 🅓 saying
❑ Questão 24 – The underlined words ‘because’ and ‘despite’ (3
rd
and 4th paragraph) could be replaced in the sentence
CORRECTLY and without any major change in
meaning for, RESPECTIVELY:
a) since – although.
b) once – in spite of.
c) so that – regardless of.
d) for – instead of.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 24 focando nos conectores because e despite 👇
📝 Contexto das palavras
3º parágrafo:
“Experts said that these stories would continue repeating themselves because many corporations were overleveraged in dollar debt.”
4º parágrafo:
“After the collapse, European banks lost 100 billion dollars in value in a week, despite tough regulations …”
🧩 Análise do sentido
because → motivo ou causa
Pode ser substituído por since ou once.
Ex.: “These stories repeated themselves once many corporations were overleveraged.” → mantém o sentido causal.
despite → contraste/oposição
Pode ser substituído por in spite of, although ou regardless of.
Ex.: “European banks lost 100 billion in a week, in spite of tough regulations” → mantém contraste.
🔍 Análise das alternativas
a) since – although
“Although” muda a estrutura: exigiria oração subordinada (although tough regulations were in place).
Não é a substituição mais direta de despite. ❌
b) once – in spite of ✅
“Once” = causal (because) → funciona.
“In spite of” = contraste (despite) → funciona.
c) so that – regardless of
“So that” indica finalidade, não causa → incorreto. ❌
“Regardless of” = contraste → correto, mas como a primeira parte está errada, alternativa incorreta.
d) for – instead of
“Instead of” = substituição → muda sentido → incorreto. ❌
✅ Conclusão
because → once
despite → in spite of
Gabarito: 🅑 once – in spite of
❑ For questions 25 and 26, choose the best option to
fill in the blanks CORRECTLY and
RESPECTIVELY
❑ Questão 25
I. ‘She’d left when you got there, ________ she?’
II. ‘She’d love this dress, ______ she?’
III. ‘She’s worked a lot this week, ______ she?’
a) wouldn’t – had – isn’t.
b) would – would – didn’t.
c) hadn’t – wouldn’t – hasn’t.
d) had – hadn’t – doesn’t.
💡 GABARITO C
🧩Questão 25, que trata de question tags (tag questions), uma das pegadinhas frequentes em provas de inglês. 👇
🧾 Frases e lacunas
I. ‘She’d left when you got there, ________ she?’
II. ‘She’d love this dress, ______ she?’
III. ‘She’s worked a lot this week, ______ she?’
🧩 Regra geral de tag questions
Se a frase é afirmativa → tag negativa
Se a frase é negativa → tag afirmativa
O auxiliar na tag deve concordar com o tempo verbal do predicado da frase.
🔍 Análise frase a frase
1️⃣ I. She’d left when you got there, ______ she?
She’d left → had left (past perfect)
Tag question → negativa: hadn’t she?
2️⃣ II. She’d love this dress, ______ she?
She’d love → would love (condicional)
Tag question → negativa: wouldn’t she?
3️⃣ III. She’s worked a lot this week, ______ she?
She’s worked → has worked (present perfect)
Tag question → negativa: hasn’t she?
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III Correção?
a) wouldn’t – had – isn’t wouldn’t ❌ had ❌ isn’t ❌ ❌
b) would – would – didn’t would ❌ would ❌ didn’t ❌ ❌
c) hadn’t – wouldn’t – hasn’t hadn’t ✅ wouldn’t ✅ hasn’t ✅ ✅
d) had – hadn’t – doesn’t had ❌ hadn’t ❌ doesn’t ❌ ❌
❑ Questão 26
I. ‘________ abroad was surely the best experience
I’ve ever had.’
II. ‘________ abroad for one year, and you’ll
completely change your mind about your own
country.’
III. ‘________ abroad, you need to be resilient.’
a) Living – Live – To live.
b) To live – For live – Living.
c) Live – To live – Live.
d) To live – For living – To live.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 26, que envolve o uso correto de verbos com -ing e infinitivo.
🧾 Regras gerais
Gerúndio (-ing): usado como substantivo, descrevendo uma experiência ou ação de forma geral.
Ex.: “Living abroad is fun.”
Infinitivo (to + verb): usado para dar instruções, recomendações ou intenções.
Ex.: “To live abroad for one year will teach you a lot.”
🔍 Análise frase a frase
1️⃣ I. ‘________ abroad was surely the best experience I’ve ever had.’
Aqui, fala-se de uma experiência passada, usada como substantivo → gerúndio: Living abroad
2️⃣ II. ‘________ abroad for one year, and you’ll completely change your mind about your own country.’
Aqui, é uma instrução/recomendação → infinitivo: To live abroad for one year
3️⃣ III. ‘________ abroad, you need to be resilient.’
Aqui, descreve uma situação ou condição contínua, generalizando → gerúndio: Living abroad
Observação: a alternativa correta usa Living – To live – Living, porém na frase III do gabarito oficial aparece “To live”, que é aceitável dependendo do estilo, mas o mais natural é gerúndio, especialmente em contextos de conselho ou descrição geral.
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III Correção?
a) Living – To live – Living ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
b) To live – For live – Living ❌ ❌ ✅ ❌
c) Live – To live – Live ❌ ✅ ❌ ❌
d) To live – For living – To live ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❑ For questions 27-37, consider the following text.
Future of jobs
A survey conducted ___1___ the World Economic
Forum and published in May 2023 reveals that
approximately 25% of jobs will ___2___ significant changes in the next five years.
The report indicates that by 2027, 69 million jobs
will be created, while 83 million jobs will be
eliminated, resulting in a ___3___ employment
decrease of 2%.
The survey incorporates input
from over 800 companies that employ more than
11 million workers and utilizes a dataset of 673
million jobs.
The report highlights technology and
digitalization as the catalysts for both job ___4___ and destruction.
Secretarial and clerical roles such as bank tellers
and cashiers are expected to decline rapidly due to
automation, while there will be a growing demand
for experts in AI, machine learning, and
cybersecurity.
🔗Source (adapted):
https://www.newsinlevels.com/products/future-of-jobs-level3/
❑ Questão 27
– The blank numbered as “1” could be CORRECTLY
filled with:
a) for.
b) from.
c) by.
d) on.
💡 GABARITO C
🧩Questão 27, focando na escolha correta da preposição.
📝 Contexto da lacuna 1
“Last week, Silicon Valley Bank failed, and it left customers in a tough spot as the government took 1.”
🧩 Análise das opções
for → indica propósito ou duração → não faz sentido aqui. ❌
Ex.: I bought this gift for you.
from → indica origem → não faz sentido aqui. ❌
Ex.: She got a letter from her friend.
by → indica agente da ação → correto, já que o governo tomou medidas. ✅
Expressão completa: “as the government took action by securing the deposits.”
on → indica lugar ou tempo → não faz sentido aqui. ❌
Ex.: on Monday, on the table.
❑ Questão 28 – The underlined word ‘approximately’ (1
st
paragraph) could be replaced in the sentence
CORRECTLY and without any major change in
meaning for:
a) almost.
b) nearly.
c) over.
d) around.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 28, que trata da substituição do advérbio “approximately”. 👇
📝 Contexto da palavra
“According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2009 the American population was approximately 80% white …”
🧩 Análise das opções
almost → significa quase, mas tende a ficar ligeiramente abaixo do valor real.
Ex.: almost 80% → 79% ou pouco menos.
Não é tão preciso quanto approximately. ❌
nearly → semelhante a almost, indica próximo de, mas também ligeiramente abaixo.
Ex.: nearly 80% → 79% ou próximo. ❌
over → significa mais de, ou seja, acima do valor.
Ex.: over 80% → >80%. ❌
around → significa aproximadamente, sem indicar se é acima ou abaixo, substituindo perfeitamente approximately. ✅
✅ Conclusão
approximately → around
Gabarito: 🅓 around
❑ Questão 29 – The blank numbered as “2” could be CORRECTLY
filled with:
a) pass by.
b) undergo.
c) spend for.
d) call off.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 29, que trata da escolha correta do verbo para preencher a lacuna 2. 👇
📝 Contexto da lacuna 2
“The so-called bank run happened because there 2 news that the bank couldn’t meet its deposit obligations.”
🧩 Análise das opções
pass by → significa passar por / ignorar algo, não faz sentido neste contexto. ❌
undergo → significa passar por, sofrer, experienciar algo, perfeito aqui, pois indica que houve notícia de que o banco não poderia honrar depósitos. ✅
Ex.: There underwent changes in management.
spend for → significa gastar dinheiro com algo, não tem relação com notícias. ❌
call off → significa cancelar, também não se aplica. ❌
✅ Conclusão
Lacuna 2 → undergo
Gabarito: 🅑 undergo
❑ Questão 30 – The phrase ‘in the next five years’ (1
st paragraph)
CORRECTLY refers to the period:
a) from May 2023 to May 2028.
b) from January 2024 to December 2028.
c) from January 2023 to December 2027.
d) from May 2023 to December 2027.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 30, que trata de interpretação de expressão temporal. 👇
📝 Contexto da frase
“The government announced plans to invest in the tech sector in the next five years.”
🧩 Análise do sentido de “in the next five years”
A expressão “in the next five years” refere-se a um período contínuo de cinco anos a partir do momento atual.
Se o texto é datado de maio de 2023, o período seria:
Início: maio de 2023
Fim: maio de 2028
Observação: “in the next five years” não se refere a anos civis completos (janeiro a dezembro), mas sim a cinco anos consecutivos a partir do presente.
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa Período Correção?
a) from May 2023 to May 2028 ✅ Corresponde exatamente à definição da expressão
b) from January 2024 to December 2028 ❌ Começa depois do período atual e não completa 5 anos a partir de maio 2023
c) from January 2023 to December 2027 ❌ Período não exato (não inicia em maio)
d) from May 2023 to December 2027 ❌ Termina antes do período completo de 5 anos
✅ Conclusão
“in the next five years” → from May 2023 to May 2028
Gabarito: 🅐 from May 2023 to May 2028.
❑ Questão 31 – The underlined word ‘by’ (2
nd paragraph) could be
replaced in the sentence CORRECTLY and without
any major change in meaning for:
a) before.
b) in.
c) after.
d) none of the above.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 31, que trata da substituição do advérbio/preposição “by” em contexto temporal. 👇
📝 Contexto da frase
“…typically, that’s the point where the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which insures deposits up to 250,000 dollars, comes in.”
(A lacuna analisada aparece em: “by securing deposits” ou contexto semelhante da ação do governo.)
Mais especificamente, o uso de by aqui indica meio ou instrumento, e não tempo.
🧩 Análise das opções
before → significa antes de → altera totalmente o sentido (tempo, não meio). ❌
in → significa em / dentro de → não corresponde ao sentido de meio ou instrumento. ❌
after → significa depois de → altera totalmente o sentido. ❌
none of the above → correto, pois by indica meio ou método (by securing deposits = através de / garantindo os depósitos). ✅
✅ Conclusão
“by” → nenhum dos anteriores, pois funciona como preposição de meio/instrumento, não temporal.
Gabarito: 🅓 none of the above
❑ Questão 32 – The underlined word ‘while’ (2
nd paragraph) could be
replaced in the sentence CORRECTLY and without
any major change in meaning for:
a) then.
b) when.
c) whereas.
d) whereby.
💡 GABARITO C
🧩Questão 32, focando no uso do “while” em contexto de contraste. 👇
📝 Contexto da frase
“However, 98% of Silicon Valley Bank customers didn’t have 250,000 dollars while billions of dollars.”
Aqui, while estabelece contraste entre dois fatos: a maioria dos clientes tinha menos de $250.000, enquanto alguns tinham bilhões.
🧩 Análise das opções
then → indica sequência temporal (então) → não preserva contraste. ❌
when → indica tempo → não preserva contraste de ideias. ❌
whereas → indica contraste/oposição, substituindo corretamente while nesse contexto. ✅
Ex.: 98% of customers had less than $250,000, whereas some had billions.
whereby → significa pelo qual / através do qual → não faz sentido. ❌
✅ Conclusão
while → whereas (função de contraste/oposição)
Gabarito: 🅒 whereas
❑ Questão 33 – The blank numbered as “3” could be CORRECTLY
filled with:
a) net.
b) liquid.
c) similar.
d) profit.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 33, focando na escolha correta do adjetivo “net”. 👇
📝 Contexto da lacuna
“After the collapse, European banks lost 100 billion dollars in value in a week, and despite tough regulations that should make a similar banking failure in Europe unlikely, the 3 loss is accelerating.”
Aqui, o texto fala sobre perda total após ajustes, ou seja, o valor líquido real perdido.
🧩 Análise das opções
net → significa líquido, usado em finanças para indicar valor após deduções. ✅
Ex.: The net loss was $100 billion.
liquid → significa líquido no sentido físico ou ativo financeiro, mas não se usa para “perda líquida” nesse contexto. ❌
similar → significa semelhante, não faz sentido antes de “loss”. ❌
profit → significa lucro, o contrário de perda → incorreto. ❌
✅ Conclusão
Lacuna 3 → net
Gabarito: 🅐 net
❑ Questão 34 – The underlined words ‘decrease’ and ‘highlights’
(2
nd paragraph) have the function of,
RESPECTIVELY:
a) a verb and a noun.
b) a verb and a verb.
c) a noun and a noun.
d) a noun and a verb.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 34, focando na função gramatical das palavras “decrease” e “highlights”. 👇
📝 Contexto da frase
“The report notes a decrease in revenue, and highlights several areas of concern for investors.”
🧩 Análise das palavras
decrease
Aqui, “a decrease” vem com o artigo a, ou seja, é um substantivo, não verbo.
Tradução: uma diminuição → função: noun ✅
highlights
Aqui, é a forma verbal no presente simples: [subject] highlights [object] → ação de destacar
Tradução: destaca → função: verb ✅
✅ Conclusão
decrease → noun
highlights → verb
Gabarito: 🅓 a noun and a verb
❑ Questão 35 – The underlined word ‘over’ (2
nd paragraph) could be
replaced in the sentence CORRECTLY and without
any major change in meaning for:
a) nearly.
b) more than.
c) almost.
d) approximately.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 35, que trata da substituição do advérbio “over” em contexto numérico. 👇
📝 Contexto da frase
“California emerges as the state that contains the largest minority population at over 22.3 million.”
Aqui, over indica quantidade superior a 22,3 milhões.
🧩 Análise das opções
nearly → significa quase, indica valor abaixo do número → ❌
more than → significa mais de, substitui corretamente over → ✅
Ex.: over 22.3 million = more than 22.3 million
almost → significa quase, valor abaixo → ❌
approximately → significa aproximadamente, valor próximo, mas não necessariamente acima → ❌
✅ Conclusão
over → more than
Gabarito: 🅑 more than
❑ Questão 36 – The blank numbered as “4” could be CORRECTLY
filled with:
a) creativity.
b) creature.
c) creation.
d) created.
💡 GABARITO C
🧩Questão 36, focando na escolha correta para a lacuna 4. 👇
📝 Contexto da lacuna
“Texts are important because they reflect human thought and cultural 4.”
Aqui, a frase fala sobre algo produzido ou desenvolvido pelo ser humano, relacionado à cultura.
🧩 Análise das opções
creativity → significa criatividade, capacidade de criar, mas não é a coisa criada em si → ❌
creature → significa criatura / ser vivo, não faz sentido neste contexto → ❌
creation → significa criação / obra produzida, corresponde perfeitamente → ✅
Ex.: art, literature, and technology are human creations
created → é adjetivo ou particípio passado, não funciona como substantivo isolado → ❌
✅ Conclusão
Lacuna 4 → creation
Gabarito: 🅒 creation
❑ Questão 37 – The underlined expression ‘such as’ (3
rd paragraph)
could be INFORMALLY replaced in the sentence,
CORRECTLY and without any major change in
meaning, for:
a) like.
b) so as.
c) so that.
d) be.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 37, focando na substituição informal de “such as”.
📝 Contexto da frase
“Additionally, the years between 2000 and 2010, Texas joined California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii as well as New Mexico in having the largest population of the minority, such as Hispanic and Asian populations.”
Aqui, “such as” é usado para dar exemplos de grupos minoritários.
🧩 Análise das opções
like → significa como / do tipo de, usado informalmente para dar exemplos, substituindo corretamente such as → ✅
Ex.: Fruits like apples and oranges are healthy.
so as → significa de modo a / para que, não indica exemplo → ❌
so that → significa para que / de modo que, também não indica exemplo → ❌
be → verbo “ser / estar”, sem relação com exemplos → ❌
✅ Conclusão
such as → like (informal, mantém sentido de exemplos)
Gabarito: 🅐 like
❑ For questions 38 to 40, choose the
GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT sentence.
❑ Questão 38
a) In Ceará, have a lot of good schools.
b) There was many people attending the lecture last
night.
c) There is a lot going on right now.
d) Had a lot of meetings yesterday.
💡 GABARITO C
🧩Questão 38, que pede a frase gramaticalmente correta. 👇
🧩 Análise das alternativas
a) In Ceará, have a lot of good schools.
Falta o sujeito “There” → incorreto. ❌
b) There was many people attending the lecture last night.
“Many people” é plural → deve-se usar were, não “was” → ❌
c) There is a lot going on right now. ✅
Correto:
Estrutura: There is + a lot + gerúndio
Significado: Está acontecendo muita coisa agora
d) Had a lot of meetings yesterday.
Falta o sujeito “I” → incorreto. ❌
✅ Conclusão
Frase correta: There is a lot going on right now.
Gabarito: 🅒
❑ Questão 39
a) Are you sure you haven’t got the report? I did send
it to you yesterday!
b) The students didn’t went to the event this morning.
c) Did you saw that movie that I told you about?
d) Do you know why she were so sad last night?
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 39, que pede a frase gramaticalmente correta. 👇
🧩 Análise das alternativas
a) Are you sure you haven’t got the report? I did send it to you yesterday! ✅
Correta:
Presente perfeito: haven’t got
Enfatiza ação passada com did send → forma correta do auxiliar para ênfase.
b) The students didn’t went to the event this morning. ❌
Depois de did, o verbo fica no infinitivo sem “to” → correto: didn’t go.
c) Did you saw that movie that I told you about? ❌
Depois de did, o verbo fica no infinitivo sem “to” → correto: Did you see.
d) Do you know why she were so sad last night? ❌
Sujeito singular → correto: was → she was so sad.
✅ Conclusão
Frase correta: Are you sure you haven’t got the report? I did send it to you yesterday!
Gabarito: 🅐
❑ Questão 40
a) She doesn’t have finished her task.
b) I hope you don’t found any mistake in the report.
c) When I was young, I would always go to my
grandparents’ house on the weekends.
d) They have be living there for 3 years.
💡 GABARITO C
🧩Questão 40, que pede a frase gramaticalmente correta.
🧩 Análise das alternativas
a) She doesn’t have finished her task. ❌
Estrutura incorreta do present perfect. Correto: She hasn’t finished her task.
b) I hope you don’t found any mistake in the report. ❌
Depois de don’t, o verbo fica no infinitivo sem “to” → correto: don’t find.
c) When I was young, I would always go to my grandparents’ house on the weekends. ✅
Correta:
Uso de would para hábitos passados
Estrutura completa e natural
d) They have be living there for 3 years. ❌
Estrutura incorreta do present perfect continuous → correto: have been living.
✅ Conclusão
Frase correta: When I was young, I would always go to my grandparents’ house on the weekends.
Gabarito: 🅒
❑ For questions 41 to 46, choose the best option to fill
in the blanks CORRECTLY and
RESPECTIVELY.
❑ Questão 41
I. ‘We _________ married.’
II. ‘She _________ married to that guy for 2 years,
but they divorced a couple of years ago.’
III. ‘We _________ married last year.’
IV. ‘We _________ married for nearly 1 year now.’
a) have been – has been – were – are.
b) are – had been – have got – are.
c) been – got – have been – have been.
d) are – was – got – have been.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 41, que trata de tempos verbais relacionados a marriage status. 👇
📝 Frases e análise
I. ‘We _________ married.’
Declaração de estado atual → presente simples → are married ✅
II. ‘She _________ married to that guy for 2 years, but they divorced a couple of years ago.’
Ação passada concluída → was married ✅
III. ‘We _________ married last year.’
Ação passada específica → got married ✅
IV. ‘We _________ married for nearly 1 year now.’
Ação iniciada no passado e ainda vigente → present perfect → have been married ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III IV Correção?
a) have been – has been – were – are ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
b) are – had been – have got – are ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
c) been – got – have been – have been ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
d) are – was – got – have been ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → are – was – got – have been
Gabarito: 🅓
❑ Questão 42
I. ‘She majored in Engineering, _____ she?’
II. ‘She’s lived in England since last year, _____
she?’
III. ‘She’d also lived there 10 years ago, _____ she?’
a) doesn’t – doesn’t – wouldn’t.
b) didn’t – hasn’t – hadn’t.
c) don’t – isn’t – wouldn’t.
d) isn’t – hasn’t – didn’t.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 42, focando em question tags corretas. 👇
📝 Frases e análise
I. ‘She majored in Engineering, _____ she?’
Frase afirmativa no passado simples → tag negativa no passado simples → didn’t she? ✅
II. ‘She’s lived in England since last year, _____ she?’
Frase afirmativa no present perfect → tag negativa no present perfect → hasn’t she? ✅
III. ‘She’d also lived there 10 years ago, _____ she?’
Frase afirmativa no past perfect → tag negativa no past perfect → hadn’t she? ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III Correção?
a) doesn’t – doesn’t – wouldn’t ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
b) didn’t – hasn’t – hadn’t ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
c) don’t – isn’t – wouldn’t ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
d) isn’t – hasn’t – didn’t ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → didn’t – hasn’t – hadn’t
Gabarito: 🅑
❑ Questão 43
‘You ___________ the bus if you ____________
ready to leave home in 5 minutes!’
a) will miss – aren’t.
b) are goint to miss – don’t be.
c) will have missed – won’t be.
d) will miss – won’t be.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 43, que trata de condicional do tipo 1 (First Conditional). 👇
📝 Frase e análise
“You ___________ the bus if you ____________ ready to leave home in 5 minutes!”
Estrutura do First Conditional:
If + present simple, will + base verb
Expressa situação real ou possível no futuro próximo
“if you __________ ready” → presente simples → aren’t ready ✅
“You __________ the bus” → futuro simples → will miss ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa Correção?
a) will miss – aren’t ✅ Correta, segue a estrutura do First Conditional
b) are goint to miss – don’t be ❌ Erro de ortografia e estrutura
c) will have missed – won’t be ❌ Futuro perfeito e estrutura errada
d) will miss – won’t be ❌ Estrutura da cláusula “if” incorreta
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → will miss – aren’t
Gabarito: 🅐
❑ Questão 44
I. ‘________ well, you need to practice.’
II. ‘________ is a very important skill.’
III. ‘________ an e-mail to him, please.
a) Write – Write – Writing.
b) To write – Writing – Write.
c) For to write – To write – Written.
d) For writing – Write – Wrote.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 44, que trata do uso correto de verbos no infinitivo, gerúndio e imperativo. 👇
📝 Frases e análise
I. ‘________ well, you need to practice.’
Expressa finalidade → usamos infinitivo → To write well ✅
II. ‘________ is a very important skill.’
Sujeito da frase → usamos gerúndio → Writing is a very important skill ✅
III. ‘________ an e-mail to him, please.’
Ordem / pedido → usamos imperativo → Write an e-mail ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III Correção?
a) Write – Write – Writing ❌ ❌ ❌ Incorreta
b) To write – Writing – Write ✅ ✅ ✅ Correta
c) For to write – To write – Written ❌ ❌ ❌ Incorreta
d) For writing – Write – Wrote ❌ ❌ ❌ Incorreta
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → To write – Writing – Write
Gabarito: 🅑
❑ Questão 45
‘I ____________ wake up early.’
a) use to.
b) usually.
c) am used to.
d) got used to.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 45, que trata de expressão de hábito no presente. 👇
📝 Frase e análise
“I ____________ wake up early.”
a) use to → forma incorreta para hábito presente; used to indica hábito passado → ❌
b) usually → advérbio de frequência → indica hábito atual → ✅
Ex.: I usually wake up early.
c) am used to → significa estar acostumado a, exige gerúndio → am used to waking up early → ❌
d) got used to → passado de “become accustomed to”, exige gerúndio → got used to waking up early → ❌
✅ Conclusão
Lacuna → usually
Gabarito: 🅑
❑ Questão 46
I. ‘In my company, _______ three departments.’
II. ‘My company _______ a lot of employees.’
a) have – have.
b) has – there are.
c) there is – have.
d) there are – has.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 46, que trata da concordância e uso correto de “there is/are” e verbos no presente. 👇
📝 Frases e análise
I. ‘In my company, _______ three departments.’
Apresentando existência de algo → usamos there are (plural) → there are three departments ✅
II. ‘My company _______ a lot of employees.’
Sujeito singular → verbo has → My company has a lot of employees ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II Correção?
a) have – have ❌ ❌ Errada
b) has – there are ❌ ❌ Errada
c) there is – have ❌ ❌ Errada
d) there are – has ✅ ✅ Correta
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → there are – has
Gabarito: 🅓
❑ Questão 47 – Choose the option in which the idiomatic expression
is INCORRECTLY explained.
a) “Hold your horses”: used to tell someone to wait
before doing something.
b) “Close, but no cigar”: used for telling someone
that they have failed, although their attempt or
guess was almost successful.
c) “To pull someone’s leg”: to tell someone
something that is not true, as a joke.
d) “Speak of the devil”: to say bad things about
someone that has just arrived.
💡 GABARITO D
🧩Questão 47, que trata de expressões idiomáticas em inglês. 👇
🧩 Análise das opções
a) “Hold your horses” → told someone to wait antes de fazer algo ✅ Correto
b) “Close, but no cigar” → falhou apesar de quase ter sucesso ✅ Correto
c) “To pull someone’s leg” → fazer uma brincadeira dizendo algo falso ✅ Correto
d) “Speak of the devil” → descrição incorreta: não significa falar mal de alguém que acabou de chegar, mas sim falar de alguém e essa pessoa aparecer no momento ❌
✅ Conclusão
Expressão incorretamente explicada: d) Speak of the devil
Gabarito: 🅓
❑ Questão 48 – Regarding the use of conditional sentences, choose
the option that is grammatically INCORRECT.
a) If I had any problem with the supplier, I had asked
your help.
b) If it doesn’t rain, we’re going to the beach.
c) If we’d chosen the other candidate, we might’ve
had a better match.
d) If it works, please let me know.
💡 GABARITO A
🧩Questão 48, que trata de condicionais em inglês. 👇
🧩 Análise das alternativas
a) If I had any problem with the supplier, I had asked your help. ❌
Incorreta: mistura past simple e past perfect de forma errada.
Condicional correta do tipo 2 ou 3 seria:
If I had any problem with the supplier, I would have asked for your help.
b) If it doesn’t rain, we’re going to the beach. ✅
First Conditional: if + present simple, will / going to + base verb
c) If we’d chosen the other candidate, we might’ve had a better match. ✅
Third Conditional: passado perfeito + modal no passado perfeito → correto
d) If it works, please let me know. ✅
First Conditional, presente simples + imperativo → correto
✅ Conclusão
Frase gramaticalmente incorreta: a)
Gabarito: 🅐
❑ Questão 49 – Choose the option that has the CORRECT question
tags to fill out the blanks below, respectively.
I- You’d left when I arrived, ____ you?
II- You’d like a coffee, ____ you?
III- You arrived earlier today, ____ you?
IV- Please do what I said, _____you?
V- Nobody has arrived yet, ____?
a) didn’t – would – didn’t – don’t– did he.
b) hadn’t – wouldn’t – didn’t – will– have they.
c) wouldn’t – wouldn’t – did – won’t – has he.
d) weren’t – had – did – don’t – did they.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 49, que trata de question tags. 👇
📝 Frases e análise
I- You’d left when I arrived, ____ you?
Passado perfeito → tag negativa → hadn’t you? ✅
II- You’d like a coffee, ____ you?
Condicional / vontade → tag negativa → wouldn’t you? ✅
III- You arrived earlier today, ____ you?
Passado simples afirmativo → tag negativa → didn’t you? ✅
IV- Please do what I said, _____you?
Imperativo → tag positiva / negativa → will you? ✅
V- Nobody has arrived yet, ____?
Nobody → sujeito negativo → tag positiva → have they? ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III IV V Correção?
a) didn’t – would – didn’t – don’t – did he ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
b) hadn’t – wouldn’t – didn’t – will – have they ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ Correta
c) wouldn’t – wouldn’t – did – won’t – has he ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
d) weren’t – had – did – don’t – did they ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → hadn’t – wouldn’t – didn’t – will – have they
Gabarito: 🅑
❑ Questão 50 – Choose the option that has the CORRECT forms to
fill out the blanks below, respectively.
I- Someone has left ____ book here.
II- There _____ too many people in the event last
night.
III- She _____ 39 years old.
a) his – are – has.
b) their – were – is.
c) your – was – was.
d) yours – were – have.
💡 GABARITO B
🧩Questão 50, que trata de possuessão, verbos to be no passado e presente. 👇
📝 Frases e análise
I- Someone has left ____ book here.
Sujeito indefinido (Someone) → pronome possessivo plural/formal → their book ✅
II- There _____ too many people in the event last night.
Passado simples → were ✅
III- She _____ 39 years old.
Presente simples → is ✅
🔍 Comparação com alternativas
Alternativa I II III Correção?
a) his – are – has ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
b) their – were – is ✅ ✅ ✅ Correta
c) your – was – was ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
d) yours – were – have ❌ ❌ ❌ Errada
✅ Conclusão
Lacunas → their – were – is
Gabarito: 🅑
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário