❑ PROVA DE LÍNGUA INGLESA: UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR-13/01/2015.
❑ ESTRUTURA-PROVA:
➭ 8 MCQs (Multiple Choice Questions) / 5 Options Each MCQ.
➭ Text – | Sony hack was angry employee and gang of hackers, experts believe | www.independent.co.uk |
❑ GABARITO:
01-E, 02-A, 03-B, 04-C, 05-D, 06-C, 07-E, 08-B
❑ TEXTO 1: Read the text below. Then, answer what is asked.
Sony hack was angry employee and gang of hackers, experts believe
North Korea likely not involved, say experts and lawyers
Andrew Griffin
The Sony hack was probably carried out by a disgruntled ex-employee who may have joined with hackers to break into the company's networks, according to a new investigation by a cyber-security firm.
An investigation has focused on a group of six people including the employee, said researchers from Norse Corporation.
Because of the scale of the attack, it was likely carried out with the help of someone with detailed knowledge of the Sony systems, they said — a theory that has been advanced before. Investigators are probing whether an employee could have become disgruntled after redundancies in May and helped carry out the attack in revenge.
Any employee was likely helped out by pro-privacy hacktivists, investigators said. Such groups have long focused their hacking efforts on Sony.
Norse isn't working on the official investigation of the hack, but has brief the FBI, it said.
The theory at least reduces the FBI's assertion that North Korea was involved in the attack, and Norse does not believe that the country had a role.
"It has always been suspicious that it was North Korea," said former federal prosecutor Mark Rasch. "Not impossible – but doubtful… It made a lot more sense that it was insiders pretending to be North Korea."
A number of security professionals have spoken out against the claim that North Korea was behind the attack, instead focusing on groups such as those described by Norse.
Source: www.independent.co.uk
According to the text, a new investigation by a cybersecurity firm found out the Sony hack was probably carried out by:
A) The North Korean Government
B) Mark Rasch
C) Norse Corporation
D) The FBI
E) An unhappy former employee who was helped out by other hackers
B) Mark Rasch
C) Norse Corporation
D) The FBI
E) An unhappy former employee who was helped out by other hackers
02 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
According to the text, Norse Corporation is:
A) A cyber-security firm
B) Pro-privacy hacktivists
C) The FBI department which deals with cyber crimes
B) Pro-privacy hacktivists
C) The FBI department which deals with cyber crimes
D) A spokesperson for Sony
E) A North Koren spy
E) A North Koren spy
03 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
A) It is undoubtedly true that Sony's networks were hacked by North Korea.
B) There has been a theory on North Korean hack attack but it is very reasonable to think that someone from inside made it deceiving people.
C) Sony cannot be hacked by foreign governments because it is a powerful American company.
D) North Korean Government is interested in American technology and politics.
E) Cyber attacks are common crimes amongst powerful economies like The United States and North Korean.
B) There has been a theory on North Korean hack attack but it is very reasonable to think that someone from inside made it deceiving people.
C) Sony cannot be hacked by foreign governments because it is a powerful American company.
D) North Korean Government is interested in American technology and politics.
E) Cyber attacks are common crimes amongst powerful economies like The United States and North Korean.
04 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
(I) The Sony hack was probably carried out by a disgruntled ex-employee (…)
(II) (…) it was likely carried out with the help of someone with detailed knowledge of the Sony systems (…)
A) Nouns
B) Adjectives
C) Adverbs
D) An adverb and an adjective respectively
E) An adjective and an adverb respectively
05 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
[...] Because of the scale of the attack, it was likely carried out with the help of someone with detailed knowledge of the Sony systems, they said — a theory that has been advanced before. Investigators are probing whether (…).
A) Passive voice, passive voice, passive voice and active voice, respectively.
B) Active voice, active voice, passive voice and active voice, respectively.
C) Passive voice, active voice, active voice and active voice, respectively.
D) Passive voice, active voice, passive voice and active voice, respectively.
E) Active voice, active voice, passive voice and passive voice, respectively.
06 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
(I) Sony hack was angry employee (…)
(II) Investigators are probing whether an employee could have become disgruntled (…)
A) Attributive adjectives
B) Predicative adjectives
C) An attributive adjective and a predicative adjective respectively
D) A predicative adjective and an attributive adjective respectively
E) An adjective and an adverb respectively.
B) Predicative adjectives
C) An attributive adjective and a predicative adjective respectively
D) A predicative adjective and an attributive adjective respectively
E) An adjective and an adverb respectively.
07 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
(i) company's networks
(ii) the FBI's assertion
A) (i) and (ii) are both contractions of the verb BE
B) (i) and (ii) are both contractions of the verb HAVE
C) (i) is genitive and (ii) is the contraction of the verb BE respectively
D) (i) and (ii) are plural forms of COMPANY and FBI respectively
E) (i) and (ii) are both genitives
B) (i) and (ii) are both contractions of the verb HAVE
C) (i) is genitive and (ii) is the contraction of the verb BE respectively
D) (i) and (ii) are plural forms of COMPANY and FBI respectively
E) (i) and (ii) are both genitives
08 – (UFPE-2015-VESTIBULAR)
A number of security professionals have spoken out against the claim that North Korea was behind the attack, instead focusing on groups such as those described by Norse.
A) It refers to 'a number of security professionals' but it is not a relative clause.
B) It tells us which thing or what kind of thing the speaker means and therefore it is a relative clause.
C) As a THAT- clause it is not part of the sentence.
D) (d) It is the subject of the sentence, so THAT could be left out.
E) In this situation THAT could be easily replaced by WHOM.